Re: Keep a copy of linux 2.0.x in Debian! (Was: Release critical bugs...)
Hi,
I agree with Torsten and Edward. The 2.2 kernels on my machine are
not very stable. Removing the 2.0.x kernels would be IMHO a very bad idea.
Regards,
Jor-el
On Sat, 14 Aug 1999, Edward Betts wrote:
> Torsten Landschoff <t.landschoff@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 09, 1999 at 03:06:47PM +0200, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > >
> > > Hmm, it may be better to remove all 2.0.x kernels. We'll base potato
> > > on 2.2 after all.
> >
> > I would formal object against this ;) Seriously, I have had a lot of problems
> > with 2.2.x and I think as long as the 2.0 series works correctly we should
> > provide it as a safe fall back.
>
> I have some odd hardware that works better in 2.0.x than 2.2.x, so I put forth
> another vote that we keep a kernel-* 2.0.38 in Potato, just have 2.2.x as the
> default kernel.
>
> --
> I consume, therefore I am
>
Reply to: