Debian Project Leader Elections 2019
Time Line
Nomination period: | Sunday 2019-03-03 00:00:00 UTC | Saturday 2019-03-16 23:59:59 UTC |
---|---|---|
Campaigning period: | Sunday 2019-03-17 00:00:00 UTC | Saturday 2019-04-06 23:59:59 UTC |
Voting period: | Sunday 2019-04-07 00:00:00 UTC | Saturday 2019-04-20 23:59:59 UTC |
Nominations
- Joerg Jaspert [joerg@debian.org] [nomination mail] [platform]
- Jonathan Carter [jcc@debian.org] [nomination mail] [platform]
- Sam Hartman [hartmans@debian.org] [nomination mail] [platform]
- Martin Michlmayr [tbm@debian.org] [nomination mail] [platform]
Withdrawals
- Simon Richter [sjr@debian.org] [nomination mail] [withdrawal mail]
The ballot, when ready, can be requested through email by sending a signed email to ballot@vote.debian.org with the subject leader2019.
Data and Statistics
This year, like always, statistics will be gathered about ballots received and acknowledgements sent periodically during the voting period. Additionally, the list of voters will be recorded. Also, the tally sheet will also be made available to be viewed. Please remember that the project leader election has a secret ballot, so the tally sheet will not contain the voter's name but a HMAC that allows the voters to check that their vote is in the list of votes. There is a key generated for each voter that is send along with the ack for the vote.
Quorum
With the current list of voting developers, we have:
Current Developer Count = 1003 Q ( sqrt(#devel) / 2 ) = 15.8350876221131 K min(5, Q ) = 5 Quorum (3 x Q ) = 47.5052628663393
Quorum
- Option1 Reached quorum: 319 > 47.5052628663393
- Option2 Reached quorum: 323 > 47.5052628663393
- Option3 Reached quorum: 336 > 47.5052628663393
- Option4 Reached quorum: 324 > 47.5052628663393
Majority Requirement
The candidate needs a simple majority to be eligible.
Majority
- Option1 passes Majority. 6.255 (319/51) >= 1
- Option2 passes Majority. 8.730 (323/37) >= 1
- Option3 passes Majority. 12.923 (336/26) >= 1
- Option4 passes Majority. 9.257 (324/35) >= 1
Outcome
In the graph above, any pink colored nodes imply that the option did not pass majority, the Blue is the winner. The Octagon is used for the options that did not beat the default.
- Option 1 "Joerg Jaspert"
- Option 2 "Jonathan Carter"
- Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
- Option 4 "Martin Michlmayr"
- Option 5 "None Of The Above"
In the following table, tally[row x][col y] represents the votes that option x received over option y. A more detailed explanation of the beat matrix may help in understanding the table. For understanding the Condorcet method, the Wikipedia entry is fairly informative.
Option | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
Option 1 | 169 | 128 | 169 | 319 | |
Option 2 | 166 | 109 | 172 | 323 | |
Option 3 | 217 | 206 | 202 | 336 | |
Option 4 | 180 | 174 | 134 | 324 | |
Option 5 | 51 | 37 | 26 | 35 |
Looking at row 2, column 1, Jonathan Carter
received 166 votes over Joerg Jaspert
Looking at row 1, column 2, Joerg Jaspert
received 169 votes over Jonathan Carter.
Pair-wise defeats
- Option 1 defeats Option 2 by ( 169 - 166) = 3 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 1 by ( 217 - 128) = 89 votes.
- Option 4 defeats Option 1 by ( 180 - 169) = 11 votes.
- Option 1 defeats Option 5 by ( 319 - 51) = 268 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 2 by ( 206 - 109) = 97 votes.
- Option 4 defeats Option 2 by ( 174 - 172) = 2 votes.
- Option 2 defeats Option 5 by ( 323 - 37) = 286 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 4 by ( 202 - 134) = 68 votes.
- Option 3 defeats Option 5 by ( 336 - 26) = 310 votes.
- Option 4 defeats Option 5 by ( 324 - 35) = 289 votes.
The Schwartz Set contains
- Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
The winners
- Option 3 "Sam Hartman"
Debian uses the Condorcet method for voting.
Simplistically, plain Condorcets method
can be stated like so :
Consider all possible two-way races between candidates.
The Condorcet winner, if there is one, is the one
candidate who can beat each other candidate in a two-way
race with that candidate.
The problem is that in complex elections, there may well
be a circular relationship in which A beats B, B beats C,
and C beats A. Most of the variations on Condorcet use
various means of resolving the tie. See
Cloneproof Schwartz Sequential Dropping
for details. Debian's variation is spelled out in the
constitution,
specifically, A.6.
Debian Project Secretary