On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 02:01:05PM +0200, Marek Habersack wrote: > That's why a static ash would be a good thing. And, to make things > efficient, the /bin/sh -> /bin/ash link would be made as a part of a single > mode bootup process - probably as a part of the sash startup sequence - the > internal ln command invoked from /root/.profile would do. Then, under normal > circumstances, a bootup sequence checks whether there's a /bin/sh.single > link (which is a saved link of what was before sash made /bin/sh point to > /bin/static/ash) and restores the previous, SYSTEM DEFAULT shell. Does it > sound reasonable? No, it sounds scary. I don't want my /bin/sh getting automatically rearranged in a possibly unstable situation. If rearrangement is necessary I'll do it myself. Mike Stone
Attachment:
pgpsu_dNVK9uN.pgp
Description: PGP signature