[SECURITY] [DLA 3971-1] firefox-esr security update
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debian LTS Advisory DLA-3971-1 debian-lts@lists.debian.org
https://www.debian.org/lts/security/ Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
November 28, 2024 https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
Package : firefox-esr
Version : 128.5.0esr-1~deb11u1
CVE ID : CVE-2024-11692 CVE-2024-11694 CVE-2024-11695 CVE-2024-11696
CVE-2024-11697 CVE-2024-11699
Multiple security issues have been found in the Mozilla Firefox web
browser, which could potentially result in the execution of arbitrary
code, spoofing or cross-site scripting.
For Debian 11 bullseye, these problems have been fixed in version
128.5.0esr-1~deb11u1.
We recommend that you upgrade your firefox-esr packages.
For the detailed security status of firefox-esr please refer to
its security tracker page at:
https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/firefox-esr
Further information about Debian LTS security advisories, how to apply
these updates to your system and frequently asked questions can be
found at: https://wiki.debian.org/LTS
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=Jxd4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: